P
POP
Guest
So proud of you that you think highly enough of yourself to make such bold declarations a day after the draft ended. That's exactly how drafts are deemed successful or not, on paper, before any of the players have set foot on the grass.
Oh, it isn't just little ole me who sees it this way: There is a world consensus that Pgh had a "C-" or "D" draft, and the rest of the div. had a "A" or "B+" draft. Do some research and you will discover the world consensus sees it this way. It has nothing to do with what I think, although, my draft grade was dead on with the world consensus, it just so happens.
1.) Burns is a raw prospect who doesn't play zone well, and we play almost all zone. He has the physical tools, so it's possible he could work out, although he won't be ready week 1. Most experts had him going in the 3rd round, not 1st.
2.) Davis is another raw DB. As a matter of fact, the second statement made by the TV crew covering the draft was, "Davis is raw....real, real raw." Most sources gave this pick a "D."
3.) Javon Hargrave was considered a solid pick, by most everyone, including me.
Hargrave brings an up-the-field presence that can pressure the quarterback. Despite playing at the FCS level, he played well every time he was on a bigger stage, including both the East-West Shrine Game and the Senior Bowl.
4.) Hawkins is another raw kid. Hopefully, we won't need him in 2016, but he is a fine pick for development and there is no one better than Munch to do that. This guy needs to hit the squat rack; his waist and lower body is too slim - he will get pushed all over the field as he is.
6.) (had no 5th) Feeney is on the small side, but he has a burst. It would be fantastic for him to replace Jarvis Jones. He should contribute to special teams right away,
7.) Ayers. A little dude with good speed. Maybe fill returner role?
7.) Matakevich. Very productive in college, but small, slow and weak. Hard to see him overcoming his weaknesses to make it in the NFL.