Not sure why I noticed this, but I do not understand this stat. Looking at the Viking / Jags game.....
C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS QBR RTG
Kirk Cousins 28/43 305 7.1 3 1 4-30 25.7 99.5
Mike Glennon 28/42 280 6.7 1 2 2-14 38.8 73.5
Ryan Tannehill 29/45 389 8.6 3 1 3-20 82.3 104.8
Cousins had more TDS, less INTS, more yards, better yards per pass, a rating 26 points higher, but yet his QBR is only 26 and lower than Glennons.....
Then if you look at Tannehills stats there is not a ton of difference between him and Cousins but his QBR is almost 60 points higher....What am i missing here or is Cousins simply miscalculated or typed.
C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS QBR RTG
Kirk Cousins 28/43 305 7.1 3 1 4-30 25.7 99.5
Mike Glennon 28/42 280 6.7 1 2 2-14 38.8 73.5
Ryan Tannehill 29/45 389 8.6 3 1 3-20 82.3 104.8
Cousins had more TDS, less INTS, more yards, better yards per pass, a rating 26 points higher, but yet his QBR is only 26 and lower than Glennons.....
Then if you look at Tannehills stats there is not a ton of difference between him and Cousins but his QBR is almost 60 points higher....What am i missing here or is Cousins simply miscalculated or typed.